Ship-generated Loading - Revision history

127.0.0.1: The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).

2022-10-21T09:12:43Z

The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).

Show changes

Merkelj at 06:18, 12 April 2022

2022-04-12T06:18:37Z

Merkelj: /* References */

2022-04-07T10:33:25Z

References

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:33, 7 April 2022
Line 79:		Line 79:
	<br />		<br />

	~~Author: [mailto:klemens.uliczka@baw.de K. Uliczka]~~

	* [[Definition of the Characteristic Parameters]]
	* [[Functional Relationships]]
	* [[Analytical and Empirical Methods]]
	* [[Hydrodynamic Numerical Methods]]
	~~<br />~~
	----		----
	back to [[Hydraulic Modelling]]		back to [[Hydraulic Modelling]]

Merkelj: /* Traditional Methods */

2022-04-07T10:32:40Z

Traditional Methods

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:32, 7 April 2022
Line 52:		Line 52:
	* water level depression and wave height<br />z<sub>A</sub> proportional to v<sub>S</sub><sup>k</sup> with 2 < k < 3.5 <br />z<sub>A</sub> proportional to n<sup>k</sup> with -1.5 < k < -1		* water level depression and wave height<br />z<sub>A</sub> proportional to v<sub>S</sub><sup>k</sup> with 2 < k < 3.5 <br />z<sub>A</sub> proportional to n<sup>k</sup> with -1.5 < k < -1
	* return current velocity<br />v<sub>R</sub> proportional to v<sub>S</sub> <br />v<sub>R</sub> proportional to n<sup>-1</sup>		* return current velocity<br />v<sub>R</sub> proportional to v<sub>S</sub> <br />v<sub>R</sub> proportional to n<sup>-1</sup>


	The diagram (Graph 1) shows the spectrum of possible calculated results given the boundary conditions at a cross-section of the Lower Elbe compared to the measurement data won from a hydraulic model of the BAW-DH.		The diagram (Graph 1) shows the spectrum of possible calculated results given the boundary conditions at a cross-section of the Lower Elbe compared to the measurement data won from a hydraulic model of the BAW-DH.

Merkelj: /* Traditional Methods */

2022-04-07T10:32:29Z

Traditional Methods

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:32, 7 April 2022
Line 52:		Line 52:
	* water level depression and wave height<br />z<sub>A</sub> proportional to v<sub>S</sub><sup>k</sup> with 2 < k < 3.5 <br />z<sub>A</sub> proportional to n<sup>k</sup> with -1.5 < k < -1		* water level depression and wave height<br />z<sub>A</sub> proportional to v<sub>S</sub><sup>k</sup> with 2 < k < 3.5 <br />z<sub>A</sub> proportional to n<sup>k</sup> with -1.5 < k < -1
	* return current velocity<br />v<sub>R</sub> proportional to v<sub>S</sub> <br />v<sub>R</sub> proportional to n<sup>-1</sup>		* return current velocity<br />v<sub>R</sub> proportional to v<sub>S</sub> <br />v<sub>R</sub> proportional to n<sup>-1</sup>
	~~<br />~~

	The diagram (Graph 1) shows the spectrum of possible calculated results given the boundary conditions at a cross-section of the Lower Elbe compared to the measurement data won from a hydraulic model of the BAW-DH.		The diagram (Graph 1) shows the spectrum of possible calculated results given the boundary conditions at a cross-section of the Lower Elbe compared to the measurement data won from a hydraulic model of the BAW-DH.

Merkelj: /* Traditional Methods */

2022-04-07T10:32:12Z

Traditional Methods

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:32, 7 April 2022
Line 47:		Line 47:

	Whereas analytical derivations can be used for the calculation of the water level depression z<sub>A</sub> (e.g. KREY, 1913; CONSTANTINE, 1960; BOUWMEESTER et al., 1977; FÜHRBÖTER, 1982), the calculation methods for determining the wave heights of ship waves, often aided by model studies and/or field measurements, are empirical (e.g., RÖMISCH, 1969). Though the short period secondary waves are taken into account by some of the empirical approaches, they are not known in detail as functions of the described parameters. This is because these secondary waves are generated as a function of ship speed and ship form and as a result of the different pressure distributions along the body of the ship.		Whereas analytical derivations can be used for the calculation of the water level depression z<sub>A</sub> (e.g. KREY, 1913; CONSTANTINE, 1960; BOUWMEESTER et al., 1977; FÜHRBÖTER, 1982), the calculation methods for determining the wave heights of ship waves, often aided by model studies and/or field measurements, are empirical (e.g., RÖMISCH, 1969). Though the short period secondary waves are taken into account by some of the empirical approaches, they are not known in detail as functions of the described parameters. This is because these secondary waves are generated as a function of ship speed and ship form and as a result of the different pressure distributions along the body of the ship.


	The following simplified relationships have been culled from the literature for the subcritical speed range (i.e., v<sub>S</sub> < 0.9·[g·d]<sup>0.5</sup>).This is the range used, for economical reasons, by merchant shipping:<br />		The following simplified relationships have been culled from the literature for the subcritical speed range (i.e., v<sub>S</sub> < 0.9·[g·d]<sup>0.5</sup>).This is the range used, for economical reasons, by merchant shipping:<br />

	* water level depression and wave height<br />z<sub>A</sub> proportional to v<sub>S</sub><sup>k</sup> with 2 < k < 3.5 <br />z<sub>A</sub> proportional to n<sup>k</sup> with -1.5 < k < -1		* water level depression and wave height<br />z<sub>A</sub> proportional to v<sub>S</sub><sup>k</sup> with 2 < k < 3.5 <br />z<sub>A</sub> proportional to n<sup>k</sup> with -1.5 < k < -1

	* return current velocity<br />v<sub>R</sub> proportional to v<sub>S</sub> <br />v<sub>R</sub> proportional to n<sup>-1</sup>		* return current velocity<br />v<sub>R</sub> proportional to v<sub>S</sub> <br />v<sub>R</sub> proportional to n<sup>-1</sup>
	<br />		<br />

Merkelj: /* Hydrodynamic Numerical Methods */

2022-04-07T10:30:37Z

Hydrodynamic Numerical Methods

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:30, 7 April 2022
Line 64:		Line 64:

	==Hydrodynamic Numerical Methods==		==Hydrodynamic Numerical Methods==
			[[de:Hydrodynamisch-numerische Methoden]]
			[[File: Seb.Bild4.jpg\|thumb\|Graph 1: Calculated water level change caused by a PANMAX container ship]]

			Through use of the presently available computer hardware and a new form of the BOUSSINESQ equation describing the spreading of shallow wind generated water waves (NWOGU, 1993)<ref>NWOGU, O., Alternative form of Boussinesq equation for nearshore wave propagation, J. of Waterway, Port, Coastel and Ocean Engineering, Vol. 119, No. 6, ASCE, USA, 1993</ref>, it was possible to simulate ship waves in laterally and depth limited waterways where the wave effects of refraction, shoaling, diffraction, reflection and most recently also current refraction as well as squat and trim (albeit at subcritical speed to date) could be included. Extensive calculations using the WAKE2D numerical model of the National Research Council of Canada - Canadian Hydraulic Center ([http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/eng/ibp/chc.html NRC-CHC, 1997]) <ref>NRC-CHC, Numerical Model Study of Ship-Induced Waves und Currents in the Elbe Estuary, Controlled Technical Report, HYD.CTR-093 (unpublished), Ottawa, Canada, 1997</ref>were commissioned by the BAW-DH as part of an investigation of the Lower Elbe river. The results of the WAKE2D calculations show that the amplitudes of the short period waves are estimated to be much higher than those measured in the physical model.

			Other theoretical numerical methods for modeling currents around ships such as FANKAN (Fluid-Automaten-Net for Canals for large blockage factor ships; PAGEL/FÜHRER, 1989)<ref>PAGEL, W. und FÜHRER, M., Umströmungs- und Widerstandsverhalten völliger Schiffe bei Kanalfahrt. Ergebnisse einer diskreten Modellierung und ihrer experimentellen Verifizierung, Mitteilungen der Forschungsanstalt für Schiffahrt, Wasser- und Grundbau, Schriftenreihe Heft 3, Berlin, 1989</ref>are not so far developed that they accurately discretize hydrodynamically optimized ship forms (e.g., a bulb-bow) and thus falsify the dynamic loading of sea waterways.

			Preliminary results using another model called SHALLOWTANK (CHEN, 1998)<ref>CHEN, X.-N., Schiffswellenbildung über einer querveränderlichen Topographie, Abstracts - 19. Duisburger Kolloquium Schiffstechnik/ Meerestechnik, Das Schiff für überkritische Fahrt, Duisburg, 1998</ref> (CHEN/ULICZKA, 1999)<ref>CHEN, X.-N. und ULICZKA, K., On Ships in Natural Waterways, Proceedings of Int. Conf. on Coastal Ships and Inland Waterways, The Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Feb. 1999, London 1999</ref> show qualitative, and to a certain degree, quantitative agreement with the measurements of ship runs acquired in the physical model of the BAW-DH. The SHALLOWTANK model has already been used for calculating ship induced loading for trans- and supercritical ship speeds (CHEN, 1997)<ref>CHEN, X.-N., Theoretische Grundlagen der Wellenwiderstandseliminierung bei überkritischer Fahrt, besonders durch den Einsatz gekrümmter Katamarane, Proceedings - 18. Duisburger Kolloquium Schiffstechnik/Meerestechnik, Das Schiff in begrenzten Gewässern, Duisburg, 1997</ref>. It is conceivable that this program could be applied for calculating ship induced loading of inhomogeneous waterways when the necessary verification calculations for a validation have been performed.

			The WAKE2D and SHALLOWTANK models are "state-of-research" but are still somewhat scientifically controversial tools for studying ship-sea waterway interaction.

			A reliable quantitative prognosis for ship induced loading of sea waterways can presently only be obtained using properly scaled physical models.

			== References ==
			<references />
			<br />

	Author: [mailto:klemens.uliczka@baw.de K. Uliczka]		Author: [mailto:klemens.uliczka@baw.de K. Uliczka]

Merkelj: /* Analytical and Empirical Methods */

2022-04-07T10:30:01Z

Analytical and Empirical Methods

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:30, 7 April 2022
Line 42:		Line 42:

	==Analytical and Empirical Methods==		==Analytical and Empirical Methods==
			[[de:Analytische und empirische Ansätze]]
			===Traditional Methods===
			[[File: Seb.Bild3.jpg\|thumb\|Graph 1: spectrum of possible calculated results]]

			Whereas analytical derivations can be used for the calculation of the water level depression z<sub>A</sub> (e.g. KREY, 1913; CONSTANTINE, 1960; BOUWMEESTER et al., 1977; FÜHRBÖTER, 1982), the calculation methods for determining the wave heights of ship waves, often aided by model studies and/or field measurements, are empirical (e.g., RÖMISCH, 1969). Though the short period secondary waves are taken into account by some of the empirical approaches, they are not known in detail as functions of the described parameters. This is because these secondary waves are generated as a function of ship speed and ship form and as a result of the different pressure distributions along the body of the ship.


			The following simplified relationships have been culled from the literature for the subcritical speed range (i.e., v<sub>S</sub> < 0.9·[g·d]<sup>0.5</sup>).This is the range used, for economical reasons, by merchant shipping:<br />

			* water level depression and wave height<br />z<sub>A</sub> proportional to v<sub>S</sub><sup>k</sup> with 2 < k < 3.5 <br />z<sub>A</sub> proportional to n<sup>k</sup> with -1.5 < k < -1

			* return current velocity<br />v<sub>R</sub> proportional to v<sub>S</sub> <br />v<sub>R</sub> proportional to n<sup>-1</sup>
			<br />

			The diagram (Graph 1) shows the spectrum of possible calculated results given the boundary conditions at a cross-section of the Lower Elbe compared to the measurement data won from a hydraulic model of the BAW-DH.

			Not only is the interaction between ship and waterway critical for forming a prognosis on ship induced loading in waterways with varying non-uniform cross-sections, but also the physical processes of wave spreading such as refraction and shoaling are critical and must be accounted for in the calculations (without parameterization).

			Traditional empirical and analytical approaches only allow for an inadequate estimation of the ship induced loading caused by sea-going merchant shipping on large fairways with varying non-uniform cross-sectional geometries, especially in tidal regions. Thus these approaches are inadequate for calculating the magnitude of future loading on waterways.
			<br />

	==Hydrodynamic Numerical Methods==		==Hydrodynamic Numerical Methods==

Merkelj: /* Functional Relationships */

2022-04-07T10:29:29Z

Functional Relationships

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 ==Functional Relationships==
 ==Analytical and Empirical Methods==
 ==Hydrodynamic Numerical Methods==

Merkelj: /* Definition of the Characteristic Parameters */

2022-04-07T10:29:07Z

Definition of the Characteristic Parameters

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 ==Definition of the Characteristic Parameters==
 ==Functional Relationships==
 ==Analytical and Empirical Methods==

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:18, 12 April 2022
Line 10:		Line 10:
	[[de:Definition der Kenngrößen]]		[[de:Definition der Kenngrößen]]

	[[File: Seb.Bild2.jpg\|thumb\|~~Graph~~ 1: Parameters and Functional Dependencies]]		[[File: Seb.Bild2.jpg\|thumb\|Picture 1: Parameters and Functional Dependencies]]

	A moving ship generates waves of different periods as a consequence of its displacement current causing pressure and water level changes at its bow, stern and alongside its hull. The following parameters describe the ship wave and current system, for example, for a ship moving in an estuary at subcritical speed (ship speed less than the phase speed of the prevailing waves):		A moving ship generates waves of different periods as a consequence of its displacement current causing pressure and water level changes at its bow, stern and alongside its hull. The following parameters describe the ship wave and current system, for example, for a ship moving in an estuary at subcritical speed (ship speed less than the phase speed of the prevailing waves):
Line 44:		Line 44:
	[[de:Analytische und empirische Ansätze]]		[[de:Analytische und empirische Ansätze]]
	===Traditional Methods===		===Traditional Methods===
	[[File: Seb.Bild3.jpg\|thumb\|~~Graph~~ 1: spectrum of possible calculated results]]		[[File: Seb.Bild3.jpg\|thumb\|Picture 1: spectrum of possible calculated results]]

	Whereas analytical derivations can be used for the calculation of the water level depression z<sub>A</sub> (e.g. KREY, 1913; CONSTANTINE, 1960; BOUWMEESTER et al., 1977; FÜHRBÖTER, 1982), the calculation methods for determining the wave heights of ship waves, often aided by model studies and/or field measurements, are empirical (e.g., RÖMISCH, 1969). Though the short period secondary waves are taken into account by some of the empirical approaches, they are not known in detail as functions of the described parameters. This is because these secondary waves are generated as a function of ship speed and ship form and as a result of the different pressure distributions along the body of the ship.		Whereas analytical derivations can be used for the calculation of the water level depression z<sub>A</sub> (e.g. KREY, 1913; CONSTANTINE, 1960; BOUWMEESTER et al., 1977; FÜHRBÖTER, 1982), the calculation methods for determining the wave heights of ship waves, often aided by model studies and/or field measurements, are empirical (e.g., RÖMISCH, 1969). Though the short period secondary waves are taken into account by some of the empirical approaches, they are not known in detail as functions of the described parameters. This is because these secondary waves are generated as a function of ship speed and ship form and as a result of the different pressure distributions along the body of the ship.
Line 54:		Line 54:


	The diagram (~~Graph~~ 1) shows the spectrum of possible calculated results given the boundary conditions at a cross-section of the Lower Elbe compared to the measurement data won from a hydraulic model of the BAW-DH.		The diagram (Picture 1) shows the spectrum of possible calculated results given the boundary conditions at a cross-section of the Lower Elbe compared to the measurement data won from a hydraulic model of the BAW-DH.

	Not only is the interaction between ship and waterway critical for forming a prognosis on ship induced loading in waterways with varying non-uniform cross-sections, but also the physical processes of wave spreading such as refraction and shoaling are critical and must be accounted for in the calculations (without parameterization).		Not only is the interaction between ship and waterway critical for forming a prognosis on ship induced loading in waterways with varying non-uniform cross-sections, but also the physical processes of wave spreading such as refraction and shoaling are critical and must be accounted for in the calculations (without parameterization).
Line 63:		Line 63:
	==Hydrodynamic Numerical Methods==		==Hydrodynamic Numerical Methods==
	[[de:Hydrodynamisch-numerische Methoden]]		[[de:Hydrodynamisch-numerische Methoden]]
	[[File: Seb.Bild4.jpg\|thumb\|~~Graph~~ 1: Calculated water level change caused by a PANMAX container ship]]		[[File: Seb.Bild4.jpg\|thumb\|Picture 1: Calculated water level change caused by a PANMAX container ship]]

	Through use of the presently available computer hardware and a new form of the BOUSSINESQ equation describing the spreading of shallow wind generated water waves (NWOGU, 1993)<ref>NWOGU, O., Alternative form of Boussinesq equation for nearshore wave propagation, J. of Waterway, Port, Coastel and Ocean Engineering, Vol. 119, No. 6, ASCE, USA, 1993</ref>, it was possible to simulate ship waves in laterally and depth limited waterways where the wave effects of refraction, shoaling, diffraction, reflection and most recently also current refraction as well as squat and trim (albeit at subcritical speed to date) could be included. Extensive calculations using the WAKE2D numerical model of the National Research Council of Canada - Canadian Hydraulic Center ([http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/eng/ibp/chc.html NRC-CHC, 1997]) <ref>NRC-CHC, Numerical Model Study of Ship-Induced Waves und Currents in the Elbe Estuary, Controlled Technical Report, HYD.CTR-093 (unpublished), Ottawa, Canada, 1997</ref>were commissioned by the BAW-DH as part of an investigation of the Lower Elbe river. The results of the WAKE2D calculations show that the amplitudes of the short period waves are estimated to be much higher than those measured in the physical model.		Through use of the presently available computer hardware and a new form of the BOUSSINESQ equation describing the spreading of shallow wind generated water waves (NWOGU, 1993)<ref>NWOGU, O., Alternative form of Boussinesq equation for nearshore wave propagation, J. of Waterway, Port, Coastel and Ocean Engineering, Vol. 119, No. 6, ASCE, USA, 1993</ref>, it was possible to simulate ship waves in laterally and depth limited waterways where the wave effects of refraction, shoaling, diffraction, reflection and most recently also current refraction as well as squat and trim (albeit at subcritical speed to date) could be included. Extensive calculations using the WAKE2D numerical model of the National Research Council of Canada - Canadian Hydraulic Center ([http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/eng/ibp/chc.html NRC-CHC, 1997]) <ref>NRC-CHC, Numerical Model Study of Ship-Induced Waves und Currents in the Elbe Estuary, Controlled Technical Report, HYD.CTR-093 (unpublished), Ottawa, Canada, 1997</ref>were commissioned by the BAW-DH as part of an investigation of the Lower Elbe river. The results of the WAKE2D calculations show that the amplitudes of the short period waves are estimated to be much higher than those measured in the physical model.